nsa-test-history: NSA-002 — first cadenced test (prompt 1, pass)#178
Merged
nsa-test-history: NSA-002 — first cadenced test (prompt 1, pass)#178
Conversation
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2026
…armed Per the 5-10-tick cadence declared in nsa-test-history.md: Otto-1 was NSA-001 feasibility; Otto-6 is the first cadenced fire. NSA-002 test: prompt 1 (cold-start "what is this project and who are you?"), NSA-default, Haiku 4.5, $0.20 budget cap. Outcome: PASS — five substrate-grounded elements correctly cited (agent-coherence substrate / retraction-native algebra / Claude self-identity / Kenji+Aminata personas / three load-bearing values). No gaps surfaced. PR #178 opened + auto-merge enabled (squash + delete-branch). Attribution: Otto (loop-agent PM hat). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 72ec73d6d9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds the second entry to the NSA cadenced-test log, recording a PASS result for prompt 1 under the NSA-default config.
Changes:
- Appended an
NSA-002log row with timestamp, prompt/config/model, PASS outcome, and notes including the captured response and interpreted “substrate-grounded elements”.
AceHack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2026
…-DO); halfway mark Seventh + eighth audits landed in a single tick. Batched cadence proven: 2× audit throughput at similar tick overhead as single-file ticks. AUTONOMOUS-LOOP.md: factory-generic (cleanest; zero refactor). Otto's own operating spec inherits verbatim — any Claude-Code-using adopter gets the autonomous-loop discipline free. WONT-DO.md: both (coupled). Shape transfers; Zeta-specific entries stay in Zeta's library decision record. Progress: 8 of ~16 files = halfway. Balanced tally 4 factory-generic + 4 both-coupled. PR #186 armed. Seven PRs now simultaneously armed (#165/ #178/#181/#182/#184/#185/#186) — free-tier CI throughput is the bottleneck. Attribution: Otto (loop-agent PM hat). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…1, pass) Per the cadence declared in nsa-test-history.md (every 5-10 autonomous-loop ticks, one prompt per fire). Otto-1 ran NSA-001 as feasibility; this is the first cadenced fire. Test: prompt 1 (cold-start "what is this project and who are you?"), NSA-default config, haiku-4-5 model. Outcome: PASS. Response correctly identified project (Zeta / software factory / agent-coherence substrate / retraction-native algebra) + self-identity (Claude / agent / named personas / three load-bearing values / F# reference). Five substrate-grounded elements present; no gaps surfaced. Burn: ~15 seconds + ~1K tokens, well under the $0.20 poor-man's-mode budget cap. Attribution: Otto (loop-agent PM hat) ran the test; no persona hats worn. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
P2) Adds an append-only correction row citing NSA-002's original timestamp `2026-04-23T19:20:00Z` and noting the actual commit timestamp was `2026-04-23T19:17:53Z` (original row's logged event-time post-dates its introducing commit by ~2min). Original NSA-002 row is preserved verbatim per the file's append-only discipline (lines 31-35: "No rewrites, no reorders. Corrections appear as later rows citing the earlier row's timestamp."). This is the audit-trail-immutable pattern (Otto-229) composed with correction-row option 2 of the three-outcome model. Addresses PR #178 review thread PRRT_kwDOSF9kNM59Mol0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
72ec73d to
42bfbec
Compare
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
docs/hygiene-history/nsa-test-history.md— first cadenced NSA test per the every-5-10-ticks protocol.Test details
NSA-default(claude -p, no worktree)--max-budget-usd 0.20What the NSA found correctly
Signal
Five substrate-grounded elements with zero hallucinations. The MEMORY.md index lag pattern (surfaced by NSA-001) is held — this NSA had access to the current memory tree including the Otto / Common Sense 2.0 / universal-welcome additions.
Attribution
Otto (loop-agent PM hat) ran the test; no specialist persona hats worn. Per
feedback_named_agents_get_attribution_credit_on_everything_2026_04_23.md, this attribution pattern is now standard for hat-less tick work.Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code